New York Times Features Guest Column Highlighting Problematic FWS Chimpanzee Rule
As NABR reported on September 21, all chimpanzees are listed as endangered under U.S. law, both wild and captive, as the result of a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) decision earlier this year. The rule went into effect on September 14. Just this past weekend, Peter Walsh, a lecturer in primate ecology at Cambridge University penned an opinion piece in the September 26 edition of the New York Times outlining potential problems resulting from the FWS decision.
“Protecting Apes Could Backfire” discusses several unintended consequences that could have detrimental effects to health advancements not just for humans but for great apes, as well. Recently, much has been made about the ancestor of the HIV virus, Ebola, and anthrax in humans but little has been mentioned about infections in great apes like gorillas and chimpanzees. Researchers are racing against the clock to stop these naturally occurring threats to preserve the species but that may all cease because of the importance of captive animals to research. Not a single research program has applied for a permit and it is uncertain as to whether any will. The piece also makes several other interesting points pertaining to the shockwaves that will be sent through research benefitting humans.
Feel free to read “Protecting Apes Could Backfire” by clicking here.